What is "Validated" Research?

In the debate over OBE, the term "research" has been used rather loosely by OBE advocates.  In fact, there are standards for what constitutes validated research — meaning research from which a definite conclusion can be drawn.

1.     It must be conducted by an independent entity — one that is not connected by association, practice, or finances to the program being studied.

2.     There must be an observable research design.  That means:

§         That a control group (not in the studied program) and an experimental group (in the program) are used which are in every conceivable way identical except for the program being evaluated.

§         That the groups are sufficiently large to draw conclusions.

§         That the conditions under which the program is conducted are not biased toward either the control or experimental group (for example, both groups gets equal instructional time).

§         That the program be of adequate duration to fairly examine it.

§         And that the evaluation of the program results be conducted in an objective, neutral manner.

3.     The results must be reproducible.  Another research team, operating separately, must be able to obtain the same results using the same methodology.

4.     The results cited must be directly traceable to the program being studied (for example, if a patient is given a new medicine and shows improvement, but continues to improve after the medicine is discontinued, then a researcher cannot conclude that the new medicine was the reason for the improvement of the patient).

5.     Program results must be evaluated externally and objectively, not in a closed circle where the program is only tested against criteria it establishes.  For example, tests are written to exactly match an OBE curriculum and no other testing instruments are allowed to judge the success of the new program.  The program's claims of success must be observable through outside measurements.

If an offered piece of documentation does not include these elements, ASK FOR THEM.  Stories are not research! (Neither are anecdotes.)

We therefore advise parents to ask the following questions when confronted with such documentation:

6.     Who did the research proving that the program was successful?

7.     Was the researcher independent of the program, not someone paid by the district or with a vested interest in the program's success?

8.     Did the program include two groups — an experimental group and a control group — which were handled in identical conditions except for method of instructions?

9.     What outside, objective measurements prove the success of the program?

10.                        Where is the research published so it can be accessed by parents and taxpayers?

You are not required to disprove every claim of education bureaucrats.  They are imposing the mandates, so the burden of proof rests with them.

National Parents' Commission

8 Entrance Drive

Johnstown, Pennsylvania 15905