Watch Out, America

September 6, 1999

Someone in Ohio just wrote to me and said that her state school superintendent had recently visited Texas to learn about the Texas education accountability system.

Sometimes I am ashamed to admit that I am from Texas when I hear people say they are using our Texas education accountability system as a model.  What that really means is that the Texas Education Agency has shown another state how to "corrupt" the data in order to fool the public.

When I hear of another fluff piece about how wonderful the Texas accountability system is, I always want to ask the following two questions:

  1. If our Texas students are making such wonderful progress, how come we classroom teachers are not just thrilled with the "new and improved" students who are entering our classrooms each year?  Why do our own classroom tests show that students' skills are getting worse rather than better?
  2. If the Texas-controlled/TEA-controlled TAAS scores are going up so much, how come Texas' scores on nationally normed tests (e.g., SAT, ACT, Stanford 9, ITBS) are not skyrocketing at the same miraculous rate?

The "system" is really very simple:

Design state tests which look good to the public when released after administering, but never let the public know how the questions are actually weighted.  Also, don't release all the various versions of the tests — just the ones that look particularly rigorous.

Structure the weighting system so that the scores are low the first year the tests are given.  Each year, lower the bar on the weighting system in order to make sure the scores go steadily up.

Require that all tests be given and scored before announcing any state results.  That way the state agency will have plenty of time to tinker with the weighting system to make sure the data shows the predetermined results.

If all else fails, dumb down the reading level/competency level of the questions themselves.  Put lots of charts and graphs on the tests so that students don't have to draw upon their own knowledge-base but can find the answers in their test booklets instead.

Have the state agency "look the other way" when schools decide to exempt huge percentages of difficult-to-teach students or if large numbers of students just happen to be absent on test days.  If the state agency gets caught, they should show "righteous indignation" and put the blame on the local schools.  The state agency should select a few schools and make high-profile "examples" of them, bringing out an "erasure report" and a "dropout report" which have been lying dormant for years.  Make the public think real teeth are being applied to the local schools.

Write new state curriculum standards which are performance-driven and which will require subjective scoring.  Make sure the standards are broad and nebulous so that just about any curriculum could fit.  Be careful not to lock in standards which are too explicit for fear that real accountability would follow.

Say that the new standards are rigorous and will take students into the 21st Century while at the same time writing the standards in grade clusters so that the outcomes-based education philosophy of "no deadlines" can be implemented without ever having to use the much-maligned term "OBE."  If no definite standards are set, nobody can be held personally responsible.

Continually desensitize the public by talking about "local control and local accountability" until the public thinks that is what they really have when in essence every classroom is controlled by state-mandated requirements which have been heavily influenced by Washington, D. C.

Change the grade levels of the tests frequently so that the public cannot compare longitudinal data over time.

Through legislation, tie all entities of the public schools — superintendents, principals, teachers, and students — to the state-mandated tests.

(Job evaluations of superintendents and principals in every school in Texas are now based upon how well their students do on the TAAS.  That makes the administrators put pressure on the teachers who put pressure on the students.  As of the 76th Legislature, students are also totally tied to the TAAS and are promoted or not promoted based upon their test results.  This is not a bad plan for education reform if the tests themselves are "the real thing" with rigorous, knowledge-based, academic content; however, Texas is in the process of writing new TAAS tests which the TEA plans to turn into performance-based, subjectively scored assessments.)

Once every entity is tied to the state-mandated tests, simply change the type of questions on the tests.  Emphasize open-response and process-oriented questions that don't have right or wrong answers but that are evaluated subjectively by the state graders.  Put lots of questions on the tests which ask students to give their opinions or state their feelings.

At that point, the state-mandated test results can easily be "managed."  The state agency who controls the tests can implement whatever social/political agendas are currently popular.  Since local teachers will be forced to teach whatever is on the state-mandated tests, popular social/political agendas will control local classroom curriculum, thus determining the way the next generation thinks.

As a classroom teacher, I am very uncomfortable with the idea of grooming my curriculum to align with the way unknown people in "high places" think.  I am much more comfortable with exposing my students to knowledge-based curriculum that is designed to increase my students' academic achievement.  After they have a solid foundation in basic, traditional knowledge, they can arrive at their own adult conclusions regarding the societal ills of our day.

Please forgive us in Texas for leading the way down the slippery slope.

Donna Garner

Texas Classroom Teacher

Hewitt, TX 76643


But … I don't live in Texas…  This isn't only in Texas, this is also in Washington state, and probably every other state, to varying degrees, with the same modus operandi.

Lynn M Stuter

Education Researcher

Washington State