Letter to the GCEL

Robin Zukoski, Executive Director, GCEL

PO Box 40011

Olympia, WA 98504-0011

July 27, 1999

Dear Commission Members,

Governor Locke formed the Commission on Early Learning on the premise that brain research proves that early childhood brain development is contingent on early childhood experiences during what is termed 'windows of learning'— "these earliest stages set the stage for the rest of that child's life…" the Commission contends on the web site.  Scientific findings and empirical data do not support this claim.

Here is an example of the weakness of this research.  The Synaptogenesis, the basis for the "golden opportunity of learning" claim, shows that the synaptic density is present in young children and concludes that it allows children to learn quickly.  However, neuroscience proves that it is not the density, but the pattern of synaptic connections that form neural circuitry which support the brain's learning function and these patterns of connections continue to form right through the second decade of life, thus negating the "window of learning" claim.

The Commission states, in the preamble of their newly approved Children's Bill of Rights, that parents have a …

golden opportunity to mold the child's brain, calling for a rich child care environment without undue academic stress during the early years.

This is overstated and dangerous, to quote John Bruer, a specialist in cognitive science and the philosophy of science,

It's a bridge too far … this brain research is pseudo-science and is serving a political agenda, not children and families.

This "window of learning" brain research is the foundation of the Children's Bill of Rights, and the very existence of the Commission of Early Learning.  Both threaten the family and the Constitutional rights of parents to raise their own children "unmolested" by the state.

Sincerely,

Sharon Oldfield