Why homeland security?
December 6, 2002
Since September 11,
2001, a day when thousands of Americans died in the horrific aftermath of three
acts of terrorism perpetrated and carried out by foreigners, the Bush
Administration has been pushing for a consolidation of federal law enforcement
agencies into one agency called the Department of Homeland Security. Now
that agency has come into being.
One would instantly
jump to the conclusion that the Department of Homeland Security will be for the
purposes of protecting the homeland, protecting America and American's from
foreign invasion. After all, isn't that what has been in the past?
But is that what will
be in the future? Remember the words of one change agent in speaking of
the paradigm shift, "New paradigm rules violate the fundamental principles
of the old."
Dear me, does that
mean that the Department of Homeland Security might not be for the purposes of
protecting Americans from foreign invasion and foreign terrorism?
Take a look at what
has been implemented in our nation over the last ten years, then
you tell me. Computers in local, state, and federal buildings have been
interfaced and streamlined to share information in an acceptable format to
all. The federal government is rapidly establishing a dossier (or dangan)
on every man, woman and child in the United States. The contents of that
dossier are extensive ... education; training; medical history inclusive of
mental, physical, and psychological; how you think; what you believe; family —
parents, spouse, children; court records; bank records; shopping records; phone
records; IRS records; military service; where you live; where you work ... the
list is extensive and getting longer by the day. It relegates the 100 FBI
files found in the basement of the White House during the Clinton
Administration to the realm of the insignificant.
The government, at
the push of a key on a computer console, will know everything there is to know
about you, including where to find you if they want to. Most people don't
realize this, and if told, quip nonchalantly, "if you have nothing to
hide, why should you care."
Let's return to the
basement of the White House and the 100 FBI files. Those files might be
relegated to the realm of the insignificant in comparison to the information
system the government has almost completed building, but the purpose in those
files being there was not and is not insignificant. The old axiom
"absolute power corrupts absolutely" definitely comes to mind.
Beyond that, there is
growing discontent in America ... there is a growing realization that states
are in financial trouble, businesses — some employing many people or providing
the better part of the economic base for a community — are going out of
business or moving their business to other countries. People are finally
beginning to wake up to the fact that their rights and liberties are rapidly
disappearing, as is the economic base and stability of their nation —
something many of us have been saying for some time now. For our efforts,
we've been called many names ... radicals, religious fanatics, the "black
helicopter" crowd, extremists, hate-mongers, bigots ... to name a
few; none complimentary, none intended to be.
This growing
discontent comes at a time when the ability of government computers, at all
levels, to interface, compile, and share information, is coming together
rapidly. Why would the government want to know all this information about
Americans?
Since the signing of
the Homeland Security Act, talk has turned to revisiting the Posse Comitatus Act which prohibits the use of American military
against the American people. After all, the reasoning goes, the military
is so much better equipped and trained to handle certain situations and
conditions ... like maybe riots, curfews, dissension, people trying to escape
tumult, huge camps thrown up in out-of-the-way places to incarcerate large numbers
of people, monitoring the movement of people.
Is Homeland Security
about protecting American soil and Americans ... or is it about protecting an
ever more tyrannical government from the people it hopes to enslave?
© 2002 Lynn M. Stuter
- All Rights Reserved