Government education and A Nation at Risk
March 11, 2003
The Hoover Institute recently issued a
report (a book actually) entitled, "Our Schools and Our Future ... are we
still at risk?" The book, 300+ pages, revisits "A Nation At Risk." The following quote is from the Hoover
Institute website at Stanford University:
"Twenty years ago,
the National Commission on Excellence in Education delivered a shocking report
called A Nation at Risk, which awakened millions of Americans to a national
crisis in primary and secondary education. But today, while reverberations from
that report are still being felt, solid and conclusive reforms in American
primary and secondary education remain elusive. Why?"
Why, indeed! Undoubtedly, the answers
given here will not be anything close to those given by the Hoover Institute,
will not be politically correct, but will go to the root of the problem.
Government schools have inherent traits
that seriously and directly affect their ability to reach the stated goal and
that have never been addressed―
1. Government
schools violate the First Amendment. Education, in every instance, is based
upon a religious world view. As such, government schools violate the First
Amendment prohibition of a state established religion and the free exercise of
religion.
2. By their
very construct, government schools serve the needs of the government,
they do not serve the people.
3. Government
schools are there to produce workers for a government managed economy.
4. Government schools are controlled from
Washington, DC, not at the state or local level.
Such sheds a great deal of light on why
government schools are failing and will continue to fail, despite the billions
upon billions of taxpayer dollars that have been, and, undoubtedly, will be
poured into them.
Hoover Institute, as part of Stanford
University, an institution receiving federal assistance in the form of tax
dollars, undoubtedly avoided, in its analyses, any mention or analysis of the
above problems. Lest we forget, federal assistance spells compliance and
conformity to the federal agenda, i.e., silence concerning any real problems or
negative effects.
It is a proven fact that the farther
from the people the governance structure is, the less
efficient and less effective the institution. Thomas Jefferson,
"The true theory of
our Constitution is surely the wisest and best ... When all government ...
shall be drawn to Washington as the center of all power, it will render
powerless the checks provided of one government on another, and will become as
... oppressive as the government from which we separated."
Government schools are no exception. As
such, they are neither efficient nor effective. That condition will continue
and grow worse as all power and governance has now been ceded, via grants to
the states, to the federal government. The states and school
districts; state departments of education, boards of education, and local
school boards are but puppet bodies implementing the dictates out of Washington,
DC.
The purpose of the government is to
justify its existence. In that pursuit, government inevitably seeks increased
power and position. It is the responsibility of the people to hold the
government in check, to oversee the instruments established by our Founding
Fathers to secure the rights of men. In failing to do so, the people have
allowed the government to take control of education and use education to
further the agenda of the government in pursuit of power and position. To that
end,
1. the religions of humanism and New Age, also the religions of
systems governance, are the foundation of what is being taught in the
government schools.
2. children
are not being taught to read; cannot think for themselves or express themselves
either verbally or in writing; have insufficient command of the English
language; can not spell; are not being taught the history of our nation; do not
know one form of government from the next; for the most part, do not know the
geography of our nation or the world, leaving them devoid of needed factual
information; have limited exposure to math and science, robbing them of the
factual knowledge base needed in many instances.
3. children are being encouraged to participate in nonacademic
endeavors as a substitute for academic endeavors to include arts and crafts,
music, sports, theater, drama, vocational prep ... and parents are being
encouraged, in the interests of structured supervision, to leave their children
in the school atmosphere longer each day.
All of this adds up to illiterate
children who can spout the government line and rhetoric quite effectively, can
tell you how he/she feels about any given issue, but whose opinions have no
foundation in fact.
What is the solution? The solution is
simple: disband government schools and the infrastructure that has been
established to govern and operate them; privatize all education in the manner
and fashion intended by our Founding Fathers and as prescribed by the First
Amendment prohibiting the government from establishing a state religion or
interfering in the free exercise of religion.
Given the current social, economic and
political climate in the United States, this will not be an easy task. Too many
people are apathetic, ignorant, and dependent on the government to do for them
what they don't want to do for themselves. The transformation to a totally
privatized system of education in accordance with the First Amendment of the
United States Constitution would require dedication, perseverance, and
patience. It would also require knowledge of the fundamental purpose of
education and dedication to achieving that purpose.
The dismantling of the government school
bureaucracy could also possibly be accomplished by the filing of a class action
lawsuit challenging the right of any government or government institution,
state or federal, to engage in the enterprise of education under the First
Amendment (freedom of religion) and the Tenth Amendment (state's rights). Such
a suit would, of course, have to prevail. That the U.S. Department of Education
violates the Tenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution would not hurt such an
endeavor.
However, totally privatized, education
would, once again, be accountable to parents, be efficient as competition would
drive the system, and, therefore, would be effective in graduating an
innovative, creative, intelligent child, capable of using the scope of his/her
knowledge to formulate a reasoned conclusion such that he/she can reach for the
star or stars of his/her choice in a free market society.
Counter to the claims of the Hoover
Institute and those of like mind, government education has been very effective
in doing what it was intended to do: increase the power and position of the
government. To expect that government schools will ever be effective in
producing an innovative, creative, intelligent populace is a pipe dream.
© 2003 Lynn M. Stuter - All Rights
Reserved